As the Guild of Air Traffic Controllers in Luxembourg, we’re not opposed to innovation, and we’re certainly not against virtual tower technology itself. However, its use must be appropriate to the environment.
A remote virtual tower might work for smaller airfields, but not for a busy international airport like Luxembourg, with around 100,000 annual movements, frequent runway crossings, and a 4,000-meter runway.
We believe a virtual tower could have a role, as a contingency solution (only!), but not as a replacement for the physical tower in day-to-day operations. Having a traditional control tower as a contingency remains the ideal solution, as it guarantees that air traffic can continue at full capacity without the need for reductions. Moreover, air traffic controllers can operate without requiring additional training or adaptation to new procedures associated with virtual towers.
Dublin illustrates a case where a second physical tower is maintained alongside a new one. This retained tower acts as a full-capacity fallback, meaning air traffic need not be reduced if the primary fails. Controllers remain within their existing operational environment and use familiar interfaces, they do not require retraining to work in a completely new system, unlike transitioning to a remote or virtual tower setup.
This perfectly aligns with the position we advocate: a traditional tower as a contingency backup ensures seamless operations without retraining or reduced capacity. When financially and logistically feasible, this is clearly the most robust and future-proof solution.
Clarifying the Role of Virtual Towers in the Digital European Sky Initiative
Some have claimed that a virtual tower is necessary to meet the goals of the Digital European Sky, but this is misleading. The Digital European Sky initiative is focused on modernizing air traffic management through digital coordination and interoperability, not mandating virtual towers.
👉 Read more here: What is Digital European Sky
Interestingly, over 80% of readers agree with our position, according to a poll by a newspaper
Read more in our recent interview with Tageblatt: 👉 tageblatt.lu article
Safety must come first. Always!!
